Money Laundering

November 4, 2005 | Federal Reserve, General

Money laundering is the practice of engaging in financial transactions in order to conceal the identity, source and/or destination of money.

Do you know someone, organization or company that participates in this scam through a blatant act or ‘willful blindness?’

Let me first explain ‘willful blindness’ before we proceed. ‘Willful blindenss’ occurs when an individual or company deliberately ignores signs that a transaction is being used to launder money or engage in other suspicious activity.

Let’s examine the possibilities that either you or someone you know may be guilty of this crime, through positive action or ‘willful blindness.’

It is your first day in a new job. You are sent to the Human Resources department to fill out the ususal forms. In the course of this you are handed a W-4 form. You tell the person from HR that you do not want to fill out this form and you are told that you are required to do so. You tell the HR person that according to the EEOC, the company is not allowed to force me into signing this form nor is it allowed to ask for my social security number. You are told that if you don’t, you don’t work. You must now sign a document under duress. The form aliviates the company from proving that you have ‘taxable income,’ because you just told them you did by signing.

You then ask the HR person if the firm is a duly authorized withholding agent as defined at IRC §§ 1441, 1442, 1443 and specifically in 26 CFR § 1.1441-7. The person looks at you as if you have two heards or ignores you completely. You then go on to ask if they have the Form 8655 Reporting Agent Authorization Certificate from the Treasury Financial Management Service. A note here on the FMS, they are the only government agency duly authorized by an act of congress to collect debt owed to the United States.

You read through the W-4 form and it explains to you that people who have no liability to pay the tax are exempt. You have read through the Internal Revenue Code, like all good Americans should, all 9,000 pages. You note that Subtitle A contains the sections of the code related to the imposition of an income tax on an individual. You also note that every section of the code, with the exception of two, that imposes a tax also states who is liable to pay that tax on the specific item or activity. In other words, if there is an imposition of a tax, the code states, and must state, who is liable to pay that tax. You also note that Section 1, which imposes a tax on taxable income of the individual, is one of the two sections that does not impose a liability.

After thoroughly reading the form and searching through the back of your head, you remember that in Connerly v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, the court stated; “The dividing line between what is lawful and unlawful cannot be left to conjecture.” You also recall that in McBoyle v. U.S., 283 U.S.25, the court notes that while the statute says one thing it doesn’t intend to imply another just because it seems as though it should. Then you suddenly remember McCullough v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 172 U.S. 102 in which the court states, “So although general language was introduced into the statue of 1871, it is not to read as reaching to matters in respect to which the legislature has no constitutional power, but only as to those matters within its control.”

You recall that on three separte occasions the High Court has stated that the legislature has no authority to place a direct tax on individuals. You deduce that since the Court has made this clear and adding that every section which imposes a tax also imposes a liability, except for Sections 1 & 11, makes this all falls into place, without any conjecture. Being a reasonable and logical person who relies on the rule of law and the fundamental rules of the Constitution, you duley note that you are not liable for the tax. Both code and the Supreme Court support your conclusion. You then check the box on the W4 form, which asks you if you are exempt. A reasonable and perfectly logical question to anyone who has read the form and the code, all 9,000 pages.

But wait, your employer insists that you have taxable income. Not being a person who stands with the sheep, you ask, “How did you make that determination?” You receive the answer, “Well how will the government run?”

Let’s put aside the fact that this conversation has already gone way down hill, because you asked a question, to which, you received a question instead of an answer. Undaunted by the fact that the person you asked is clueless you answer that persons question with, “About one and fifty times better, thank you.”

Having built an extensive knowledge in the field of economics and having complete disdain for Greespan and all those so called economic experts, you note to this person that we have a fiat monetary system, and therefore there is no mathematical reason for the government even to collect a tax. The government prints money with absolutely no hard commodity to back the circulation of the paper. You also enlighten this person to the fact that there does not seem to be any path between the money that is paid into the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, with the exception of a few billion dollars out of the more than one-trillion the government reports collecting from indiviuals and corporations. You also ask the very poignant question, “Why is a member association, having nothing to do with the government, in the middle of this transaction?” Another reasonable question, when one considers the hunt for our ‘Money Laundering’ artists.

It is a system of fiction, however, you do your due dilligence and ask reapeatedly for the employer to show you, in the statutes and regulations, how it made the determination. You receive no answer, nor will you receive one from any corporation, attorney, CPA or any person within the government. There simply isn’t an answer to be given, but it doesn’t end there because you understand that the system is based in fraud and you realize there must be more to it than just the illegal collection of a direct tax on individuals – See Stanton v. Baltic.

Mathematics does not lie. If we do not back our currency with a hard commodity, in order to balance the books, why do we need to repay anything, and to whom are we repaying the money?

Are we repaying ourselves?

The answer is that the money is being laundered for the entity that controls our lives. We have become entangled in one of the most nefarious money laundering schemes ever devised. It is a scam, by which our wealth is confiscated and turned over to a group of people who control the entire monetary system. “Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States.” — Sen. Barry Goldwater

Taxation is a means of depleting the will and the wealth of the masses. It is a system that has been in place for centuries, and our Founding Fathers realized the scam for what it was and endeavored to prevent it by allowing congress to tax only by apportionment. By doing so they were attempting to make it impossible to collect a direct tax from the individual. What they intoned in the body of the Constitution, and their noted arguments, was that the imposition of a tax on an individual was taboo and according to the Supreme Court, the sixteenth amendment gave congress no new power to tax.

Have the courts stated that an income tax is legal? Yes they have, but the deviding line comes to what and who can be taxed. “A man is free to lay hand upon his own property. To acquire and possess property is a right, not a privilege … The right to acquire and possess property cannot alone be made the subject of an excise…. nor, generally speaking, can an excise be laid upon the mere right to possess the fruits thereof, as that right is the chief attribute of ownership.” — Jerome H. Sheip Co. v. Amos

The arguments do not end in the rule of law because we have become a society that fails to, and more importantly, refuses to abide by the rule of law. We have abandoned the true meaning of the Constitution and are all too willing to chasitse those who wish to challenge the deceit.

Reviewing the facts should lead us to some conclusion of what is taking place when an employer demands a social security number, demands that you fill out a form making you liable for a tax that the High Court has stated is un-constitutional and then reporting to a non-government entity that you have ‘taxable income.’

The first conclusion, that is obvious, is that the employer cannot state, in law, where your liability is enumerated. I know this, because I have asked and will continue to do so. This would qualify as ‘willful blindness.’

The second is that the employer is contributing to a ‘money laundering’ scheme, with regard to the actions of entities within and outside of the government.

The third is that you have been made the victim of what I refer to as a terrorist activity. Some may conclude that it is a direct violation of the RICO statutes. You will be denied employment if you refuse to hand over a certain amount of your property each year. You will not be allowed a means of liberty or the pursuit of happiness.

The fourth is that you, by your blindness, are contributing to the eventual collapse of the monetary system, the future of your children, and the very existence of the Republic.

The fifth is that there have been people prosecuted for a crime to which no one can apply a statute. It will happen with the blessings of your fellow citizens and in direct violation of the Sixth Amendment; “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy… and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation…”

I perfectly understand how difficult it is to break the pattern of brain washing but it is a step that we must take. Mathematics does not lie, our system is in jeopardy. It will not effect the power brokers but it will reach its intended goal, the ultimate subjugation of the masses into a system where we are continually burdened with higher taxes. The mere right to own property will become a legend rather than a reality.

What does it take on our part? Perhaps the system has become infallable, because the masses will not learn and they are more than willing to prosecute those who will. It may take a task too daunting for the weak of heart, the reading and deceiphering of the tax code, all 9,000 pages.

‘Nick’