RTR Forum

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Login form protected by Login LockDown.


Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search:

— Forum Scope —



— Match —



— Forum Options —




Wildcard usage:
*  matches any number of characters    %  matches exactly one character

Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
MN Gov. Dayton & Judge Wilhelmina Wright – Problem with our Courts is not Judges’ skin color
September 4, 2012
6:10 pm
DonMashak
Minneapolis, MN
Member
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
July 12, 2012
Offline
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UKqW…..00x428.jpg

Those were my thoughts.

* and ** See very end of article

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

Please join with me in mutually pledging to each other and our fellow citizens our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended. [Last Paragraph, Declaration
of Independence http://bit.ly/ruPE7z ]

This article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

TellMyPolitician http://goo.gl/1FWfz

 

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Get out of our House #GOOOH
http://GOOOH.com

Critical Thinking Notice – This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.

 

*

  • Simulated
    Litigation means the Court reaching a decision with the appearance that
    it was done pursuant to the Rule of Law properly applied to the freely
    admitted relevant facts in evidence and in accordance with the “proper
    administration of justice”, but it was not. Most often this happens
    with the Court or the “powers that be” “telegraph” to the attorneys of
    the litigants the outcome they desire. The Court and the attorneys of
    the litigants engage in some behavior, activities or agreement that
    allows the Court to make the desired decision based facts in evidence.
    However, the lawyers of the litigants control the Facts in Evidence on
    the official Court record by engaging in “fact shaping”.
  • Fact
    Shaping means when the Court and the lawyers of the Court control what
    evidence get on the official record in a manner that will allow the
    Court to make the courts “telegraphed” desired decision, rather than the
    Court reaching its decision in accordance with the proper
    administration of justice defined as the Rule of Law properly applied to
    the nonmachinated, freely admitted relevant facts in evidence.
  • Telegraph
    or Telegraphing means certain gestures and/or phrases used between the
    Court and the Lawyers of Litigants to suggest a direction or course of
    action, often in violation of the principles of the “proper
    administration of justice” and the Rule of Law. Most often they are so
    subtle and rely upon experience as a lawyer, that the actual “civilian”
    litigant does not even perceive them.

**
Judicial Code Red – Unwritten and denied rules of the Judiciary. Among

these rules are the rules that all Minnesota Judges retire in the time framer
required to allow the Governor to appoint their successor. Another Code
Red is the Rule that says Minnesota lawyers don’t run against incumbent
Minnesota Judges. Failure of a lawyer or judge to follow the Judicial
Code Red rules is career limiting and may include other punishments.
Judicial Code Red and the Judicial Code Red Punishments are almost
always done in such a way as to be plausibly deniable as they are
contrary to the Rule of Law and the public policy of the
Constitutionally Limited, Representative Republic in which we live.

September 11, 2012
3:15 pm
Nick
Moderator
Forum Posts: 1582
Member Since:
October 26, 2007
Offline

I, for one, am very happy when corruption is pointed out. I would be much happier if the topic for discussion was the impeachment of corrupt individuals.

As long as we are standing idly by and begging the system we will continue to hear about the corruption.

We desparately need a governor, or state legislature that will turn the tide by establishing the rule of law as it was intended.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 64

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Killer Yankee: 12

DonMashak: 6

truthsupplier: 6

Roxy: 4

Goldfish: 4

Sully: 3

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 367

Moderators: 1

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 5

Forums: 12

Topics: 2342

Posts: 2666

Newest Members: FlamingSkulls, devonpeterson, NmcygYmsttvBFtBcoy, katkenner, slaughery, fossiljen

Moderators: Nick (1582)

Administrators: PatriotG (1052)