Archive for the ‘President’ Category
For anyone who has not been made up to speed on the eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the president, there have been numerous suits filed in several different courts to obtain a hearing on his qualification.
Whether the argument is pointless, or if there is something to be learned, the most crucial part of this whole miasma is that the courts are consistently telling the People that they have no right to ask, or that a questionable single document is enough to satisfy the Constitutional question.
I don’t have access to any of the records that would be considered critical, and neither does anyone I know. We are told that they are there, but none of us are allowed to see them.
Why are the president and the Democratic Party spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep his records secure? I don’t know how many of you have applied for a job recently in any critical sector, but your potential employer is doing a thorough background check on who you are, and that includes what your credit might look like.
Some apartment owners, probably most, in New York are doing background checks in accordance with standards set through Sarbanes-Oxley. You, or I, can’t even get on a plane without them, those fun folks at the airports, doing an investigation of what we have on our person, questioning everything including a tool as essential as a nail clipper.
So why is that we should just shut our mouth when it comes to the highly suspect activity surrounding Obama’s records? Is there something to hide? Congressman Trent Franks is convinced that Obama is qualified, but that there is something that must be resolved.
World Net Daily has been on the case from the outset, long before Obama even had the nomination to be president.
Congressman Franks is convinced, based on a couple of newspaper clippings that Obama is indeed qualified. For heck’s sake congressman, are you also convinced that you should be sending a 1040 to the IRS?
Let me rephrase that. Are you also convinced that you should be sending a form that violates 44 U.S.C. 3500 – 3520, to an entity that the Supreme Court once observed had not been created by an act of congress? Or should we be taxing the people of this country into oblivion in order to bail out institutions that have caused an economic crisis from which we may not be able to recover?
And maybe we should give more power to an institution, the Federal Reserve, which you pretend is actually a part of the government while we’re at it. And while we are at it, which we are, lets bail out a bunch of foreign banks to boot.
Back to the point of Obama. We know one thing for sure; government officials lie, and the major media swears to it.
The problems we face from the vetting of Obama’s qualification will not go away with a real and true copy of the original birth certificate because the issue has gone on too long with the government telling the people that we have no right to pose such questions, or to demand a response. Those are fighting words where I come from, but we are all too willing to lie down at the foot of some judge who has no more authority than does any individual sovereign.
Now another point has come to light in this struggle to find the truth. There is now information coming from Hawaii officials that Obama’s records have been amended. Devvy Kidd has written an article OBAMA'S INELIGIBILITY: HOW DEEP DOES THE CORRUPTION GO? Read it as it is important you at least understand the issue is simply not the question of eligibility, but of a broad based fraud.
I have written this short article for one purpose, and that is to address the question of the major media. I have been asked on more than one occasion, “Don’t you think that if this had any teeth, people like Rush Limbaugh, or Sean Hannity would be all over it?”
No, I don’t believe that either would jeopardize the lucrative positions that they have attained for themselves. Nor do I believe that the American media represents in any form an honest enterprise seeking to divulge the truth to their listeners, viewers, or readers.
Scrupulous and straightforward reporting has not been part of the American landscape for decades. Journalists are no longer people of honor, but rather they are propagandists making huge sums of money to look good and deliver the information needed to keep you in the dark.
There is nothing we can do. I can’t vote for a third party because I’m throwing my vote away. You can’t fight City Hall. I have heard all the tripe for too long and far too many times. Your congress critter, and the minions that permeate government are counting on the fact that you are convinced nothing can be done. More importantly, they are counting on the fact that you have completely lost touch with the spirit of the American Revolution.
‘Nick’
No Comments »
Dear Friends and Associates,
The man who sent this is a friend of mine, Jim Schwiesow, so you can rely on the information. This will verify much of what you are hearing from other sources. As Obama continues to lose, his goons will get more aggressive until there is bloodshed, which is what I think he wants so he can declare martial law(Martial Law is as Unconstitutional as most of the laws now being passed by Traitors). Obama and most government officials are cowardly traitors who refuse to meet with the people on a fair basis. This is not going to end well, treason never does, think French Revolution.
Andrew C. Wallace
This was sent to me by a friend in Bozeman , MT who was there.
Why do we tolerate this?
Hello All,
By now you have probably heard that President Obama came to Montana last Friday. However, there are many things that the major news has not covered. I feel that since Bill and I live here and we were at the airport on Friday I should share some facts with you. Whatever you decide to do with the information is up to you. If you chose to share this email with others I do ask that you DELETE my email address before you forward this on.
On Wednesday, August 5th it was announced locally that the President would be coming here. There are many groups here that are against his healthcare and huge spending so those groups began talking and deciding on what they were going to do. The White House would not release ANY details other than the date.
On about Tuesday Bill found out that they would be holding the "Town Hall" at the airport. (This is only because Bill knows EVERYONE at the airport) Our airport is actually located outside of Belgrade (tiny town) in a very remote location. Nothing is around there. They chose to use a hangar that is the most remotely located hangar. You could not pick a more remote location, and you can not get to it easily. It is totally secluded from the public.
FYI: We have many areas in Belgrade and Bozeman which could have held a large amount of folks with sufficient parking. (gymnasiums/auditoriums). All of which have chairs and tables, and would not have to be SHIPPED IN!! $$$$$
During the week, cargo by the TONS was being shipped in constantly. Airport employees could not believe how it just kept coming. Though it was our President coming several expressed how excessive it was, especially during a recession. $$$$$
Late Tuesday/early Wednesday the 12th, they said that tickets would be handed out on Thursday 9am at two locations and the president would be arriving around 12:30 Friday.
Thursday morning about 600 tickets were passed out. However, 1500 were printed at a Local printing shop per White House request. Hmmmm......900 tickets just DISAPPEARED.
This same morning someone called into the radio from the local UPS branch and said that THOUSANDS of Dollars of Lobster were shipped in for Obama. Montana has some of the best beef in the nation!!! And it would have been really wonderful to help out the local economy. Anyone heard of the Recession?? Just think...with all of the traveling the White House is doing. $$$$$ One can only imagine what else we are paying for.
On Friday Bill and I got out to the airport about 10:45am. The groups that wanted to protest Obama's spending and healthcare had gotten a permit to protest and that area was roped off. But that was not to be. A large bus carrying SEIU (Service Employees International Union) members drove up onto the area (illegal)and unloaded right there. It was quite a commotion and there were specifically 2 SEIU men trying to make trouble and start a fight. Police did get involved and arrested the one man but they said they did not have the manpower to remove the SEIU crowd.
The SEIU crowd was very organized and young. About 99% were under the age of 30 and they were not locals! They had bullhorns and PROFESSIONALLY made signs. Some even wore preprinted T-shirts. Oh, and Planned Parenthood folks were with them.....professing abortion rights with their T-shirts and preprinted signs. (BTW, all these folks did have a permit to protest in ANOTHER area)
Those against healthcare/spending moved away from the SEIU crowd to avoid confrontation. They were orderly and respectful. Even though SEIU kept coming over and walking through, continuing to be very intimidating and aggressive at the direction of the one SEIU man.
So we had Montana folks from ALL OVER the state with their homemade signs and their DOGS with homemade signs. We had cowboys, nurses, doctors you name it. There was even a guy from Texas who had been driving through. He found out about the occasion, went to the store, made a sign, and came to protest.
If you are wondering about the press.....Well, all of the major networks were over by that remote hangar I mentioned. They were conveniently parked on the other side of the buildings FAR away. None of these crowds were even visible to them. I have my doubts that they knew anything about the crowds.
We did have some local news media around us from this state and Idaho . Speaking of the local media...they were invited. However, all questions were to be turned into the White House in advance of the event. Wouldn't want anyone to have to think off the top of their head.
It was very obvious that it was meant to be totally controlled by the White House. Everything was orchestrated down to the last detail to make it appear that Montana is just crazy for Obama and government health-care. Even those people that talked about their insurance woes........the White House called our local HRDC (Human Resource and Development Committee) and asked for names. Then the White House asked those folks to come. Smoke and mirrors...EVERYTHING was staged!!!!!!!!!!!
I am very dismayed about what I learned about our current White House. The amount of control and ...
No Comments »
WorldnetDaily
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa
WASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.
2 Comments »
Originally from WND.com
Also known as the: "The Obama Birth Certificate Protection Act" ?
A bill approved by the House of Representatives and referred to the Senate would prohibit federal employees of executive branch from being compelled to release any document unless a court makes a specified determination by a preponderance of evidence – legislation at least one group suspects is designed to protect Barack Obama's elusive birth certificate from release.
RTR: We have read this legislation a few times, and dont really make the connection with the Obama Birth Certificate question. There is one thing however, that is certain, the first portion of the legislation is in contradiction with what is stated in the latter portion. If anything, this legislation is vague and does leave some questions open.
Full Text of:
HR 985 RFS
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 985
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 1, 2009
Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
AN ACT
To maintain the free flow of information to the public by providing conditions for the federally compelled disclosure of information by certain persons connected with the news media.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Free Flow of Information Act of 2009’.
SEC. 2. COMPELLED DISCLOSURE FROM COVERED PERSONS.
(a) Conditions for Compelled Disclosure- In any matter arising under Federal law, a Federal entity may not compel a covered person to provide testimony or produce any document related to information obtained or created by such covered person as part of engaging in journalism, unless a court determines by a preponderance of the evidence, after providing notice and an opportunity to be heard to such covered person--
(1) that the party seeking to compel production of such testimony or document has exhausted all reasonable alternative sources (other than the covered person) of the testimony or document;
(2) that--
(A) in a criminal investigation or prosecution, based on information obtained from a person other than the covered person--
(i) there are reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has occurred; and
(ii) the testimony or document sought is critical to the investigation or prosecution or to the defense against the prosecution; or
(B) in a matter other than a criminal investigation or prosecution, based on information obtained from a person other than the covered person, the testimony or document sought is critical to the successful completion of the matter;
(3) in the case that the testimony or document sought could reveal the identity of a source of information or include any information that could reasonably be expected to lead to the discovery of the identity of such a source, that--
(A) disclosure of the identity of such a source is necessary to prevent, or to identify any perpetrator of, an act of terrorism against the United States or its allies or other significant and specified harm to national security with the objective to prevent such harm;
(B) disclosure of the identity of such a source is necessary to prevent imminent death or significant bodily harm with the objective to prevent such death or harm, respectively;
(C) disclosure of the identity of such a source is necessary to identify a person who has disclosed--
(i) a trade secret, actionable under section 1831 or 1832 of title 18, United States Code;
(ii) individually identifiable health information, as such term is defined in section 1171(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d(6)), actionable under Federal law; or
(iii) nonpublic personal information, as such term is defined in section 509(4) of the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act (15 U.S.C. 6809(4)), of any consumer actionable under Federal law; or
(D)(i) disclosure of the identity of such a source is essential to identify in a criminal investigation or prosecution a person who without authorization disclosed properly classified information and who at the time of such disclosure had authorized access to such information; and
(ii) such unauthorized disclosure has caused or will cause significant and articulable harm to the national security; and
(4) that the public interest in compelling disclosure of the information or document involved outweighs the public interest in gathering or disseminating news or information.
(b) Authority To Consider National Security Interest- For purposes of making a determination under subsection (a)(4), a court may consider the extent of any harm to national security.
(c) Limitations on Content of Information- The content of any testimony or document that is compelled under subsection (a) shall--
(1) not be overbroad, unreasonable, or oppressive and, as appropriate, be limited to the purpose of verifying published information or describing any surrounding circumstances relevant to the accuracy of such published information; and
(2) be narrowly tailored in subject matter and period of time covered so as to avoid compelling production of peripheral, nonessential, or speculative information.
(d) Rule of Construction- Nothing in this Act shall be construed as applying to civil defamation, slander, or libel claims or defenses under State law, regardless of whether or not such claims or defenses, respectively, are raised in a State or Federal court.
(e) Exception Relating to Criminal or Tortious Conduct- The provisions of this section shall not prohibit or otherwise limit a Federal entity in any matter arising under Federal law from compelling a covered person to disclose any information, record, document, or item obtained as the result of the eyewitness observation by the covered person of alleged criminal conduct or as the result of the commission of alleged criminal or tortious conduct by the covered person, including any physical evidence or visual or audio recording of the conduct, if a Federal court determines that the party seeking to compel such disclosure has exhausted all other reasonable efforts to obtain the information, record, document, or item, respectively, from alternative sources. The previous sentence shall not apply, and subsections (a) and (b) shall apply, in the case that the alleged criminal conduct observed by the covered person or the alleged criminal or tortious conduct committed by the covered person is the act of transmitting or communicating the information, record, document, or item sought for disclosure.
SEC. 3. COMPELLED DISCLOSURE FROM COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE PROVIDERS.
(a) ...
No Comments »
Written by Ian D. Erickson
John Birch Society
On February 26, 2009, Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) introduced H.R. 1207, The Federal Reserve Transparency Act, into legislation. Currently the bill has been referred to the Financial Services Committee whose chairman is Representative Barney Frank (D-Mass.). This particular committee is comparable to a mini-congress to see if the bill should reach the House floor for a vote.
A groundswell of support has both Republicans and Democrats cosponsoring this bill. As of this posting there are 137 republican cosponsors, and 25 democrat cosponsors. Many organizations including Campaign for Liberty, Freedom Works, Center for Fiscal Accountability, of course The John Birch Society, and even Democrats.com have been rallying grassroots support for this bill.
House Resolution 1207 states the following:
"To amend title 31, United States Code, to reform the manner in which the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System is audited by the Comptroller General of the United States and the manner in which such audits are reported, and for other purposes."
This, in layman's terms, enables the veil over the Federal Reserve to be lifted so that the public can see how their money is being utilized. One would assume that a bill such as this would have gained support on an unprecedented scale. The Obama Administration has been all about transparency in its verbiage since taking office. However, President Obama has not encouraged Democratic lawmakers to stand behind a bill that would allow for that much needed transparency.
Ron Paul explains this circumstance in an interview held on April 22 with Judge Andrew Napolitano on Freedom Watch: “Once we get the audit bill passed and we can reveal what they are doing, I think the next step is to end the Fed. That’s why they don’t want that.”
Many supporters of the bill believe an audit will lead to a public outcry against he Federal Reserve and call for its immediate closure. Ron Paul believes that is why more law makers have not jumped on board this bill, because it would do just that, end he Federal Reserve.
Recent additions to the cosponsor list include both Representatives Leonard Lance (R-NJ), former Sate Senator and first term congressman from New Jersey's 7th district and 10-year veteran of the House Jay Inslee (D-WA) from Washington's 1st district.
There is a Senate version of the bill, S. 604, introduced by Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) which has received no cosponsors as of yet, and currently sits in the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
For a full list of cosponsors and to see if your representative has decided to stand for transparency visit this website.
1 Comment »
Recent Form Posts